x-forecast · paper portfolio
Research · Beta · 5 peers tracked

Peer Comparison

Own NAV vs RPAR (Risk Parity) · DBMF (CTA) · MCRO (HFRX Macro) · QAI (Multi-strategy) · AOA (80/20). Public ETFs as proxies for indices that are not freely accessible.

Why these five

ETF Name Proxy for
RPAR RPAR (Risk Parity ETF) Risk Parity 配置 — Pure risk-parity comparison to Base group
DBMF DBMF (Managed Futures) SG CTA / Newedge Trend Index — systematic CTA comparison
MCRO MCRO (IQ Hedge Macro Tracker) HFRX Macro Index — global macro hedge fund comparison
QAI QAI (IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy) Multi-strategy hedge fund pool comparison
AOA AOA (iShares 80/20 Aggressive Allocation) 80/20 stock-bond mix — aggressive baseline

Comparison framework

Each month, we compute the following for Base / Bull / Bear vs each peer:

Metric Definition What it reveals
excess return r_self − r_peer (monthly) raw out/under-performance
tracking error stdev(r_self − r_peer) annualised style drift
correlation corr(r_self, r_peer) rolling 60d beta exposure to peer style
info ratio excess return / tracking error risk-adjusted skill (>0.5 = noteworthy)

Current status (Beta)

The five peer tickers have been added to the universe and will be fetched on the next data:all run. The first comparison table publishes 2026-08-31 once ≥3 months of overlapping NAV data exists. Until then this page documents the framework but contains no comparative numbers — the sample is too small to be informative and we explicitly refuse to publish noise.

Caveats

  • MCRO is an ETF that tracks an HFRX-like index — it is NOT the HFRX Macro Index itself. Tracking error to the actual index is ~50-100bp/yr.
  • DBMF launched in 2019 — longer history (CTA index back to 1990) is not directly comparable.
  • All peer ETFs are USD-denominated. Comparison is in local currency (consistent with v1 NAV).
  • Peer benchmarks are intended to expose style drift, not to "beat". Persistent close tracking to one peer = our framework converges to that style without intending to.